Persistent, unwanted interactions, such as asking for dates continually.Interference with someone’s ability to move freely and.Displays of inappropriate or offensive materials.It can also occur when there is other verbal or physical conduct that is sexual in nature. Hostile work environment is the type of sexual harassment that occurs when there is frequent or pervasive unwanted sexual comments, advances, requests, or other similar conduct. With quid pro quo harassment, the employer can also be found legally liable for the actions of the supervisor who commits this act because supervisors are deemed to be acting on behalf of the employer. For example, this might mean someone is threatened with job loss, demotion, bad performance reviews, unfavorable shifts, less desirable project assignments, and so on.Ī single incidence of quid pro quo sexual harassment is illegal and can be the grounds for a lawsuit. This type of sexual harassment can also occur when there is a threat of negative work consequences for refusing to confer sexual favors. Sought-after work assignments or work shifts.Favorable performance reviews or recommendations,.Employment benefits in this context might include: This is because the person in a position of power has the ability to confer employment benefits.

Usually this type of sexual harassment, by its nature, occurs between someone in a position of power and a subordinate. For example, this might be a supervisor offering a promotion if an employee will meet his or her sexual demands. Quid pro quo is the type of harassment that occurs when some type of employment benefit is made contingent on sexual favors in some capacity. Let’s take a look at the difference between the two main types of sexual harassment in the workplace: quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Quid Pro Quo Versus Hostile Work Environment

Quip pro quo